Archive for January, 2009

Social Business, or The Future of Capitalism

INCLUDES A FREE COPY OF “This Wasn't Just Any Election v4.0″! CLICK NOW!

What kind of company do you work for? Does your CEO maximize benefits for himself (it's usually a “him” and a “self”ISH BASTARD), his upper-management, and anyone climbing his ladder? Or does he attempt to maximize benefits for the advancement of the company ITSELF and ALL of the employees, preferably equally?

When capitalism as we know it fails, the knee-jerk reaction is to look to the past, in theory and in practice. We read Marx, mourn the failing Cuban experiment, and generally theorize how we can get the whole communism thing to work anew… I've personally wondered if societies like the U.S.S.R. might have worked better had the internet been prevalent in those days. But history repeats itself only so much. Now we DO have the internet, ever-expanding to eventually and inevitably be a pure voice of the masses who's role in a revolution would render a monolithic, communistic masthead irrelevant. We've needed leadership to help hasten the overthrow of our current system, but it's been happening slowly already, and with the second coming of Christ, err, Obama, we're more quickly on our way.

So what makes us think we should stop well-meaning entrepreneurs doing some really innovative, ethical business and instead try another communist-flavored system that might stifle creativity and stuff predetermined ethics under a government umbrella?

The fact is, there's Social-Capitalistic competition in our market right now, from the acknowledgment that corporations who retain employees and improve their lives also tend to do better economically and sustainably, to businesses whose very mission statements aim to lift people out of poverty, operate off the grid, save the whales, whatever. The point is that some of them are thinking about saving the planet and the human race in ways that government alone has never had the creative chops to accomplish.

Let's look at what we have now and consider the possibility of a quiet, peaceful transition to something better: Social Business.

The aforehyperlinked Wiki argues that the Social Business model would require its own “Social Wall Street Journal and Social Financial Times”. I don't think we need to think so narrowly (some people sincerely cringe at the very WORD, “social”, let alone some perceived encroachment into their precious Wall Street). We'll be a little sneakier than that: play within the capitalist system, blow corrupt CEOs out of the water with ethical businesses that nab all the creative talent in the world and leave exploitative ones in the dust. Workers will naturally gravitate toward companies that respect them. I dream of a future where the new Capitalists compete for who can save the world first. Maybe mega-social-corporations would arise, swallowing smaller ones, and on-and-on until we're ALL number one.

SEX!

I knew I'd catch your attention with that headline. And that proves the whole point of this post: we're all doing it, we're all interested in it, but our public discussions about it aren't pervasive enough to underline those facts. And when we finally DO discuss it, the language serves to suppress sex-positive attitudes, highlighting instead what our culture deems are sex offenses. When I discuss it, and I often do, some brave souls join in. Most deem me “untouchable” for it.

I hid my previous blog specifically because, although it served the, albeit vengeful, purpose of rebutting the Republican offensive against Bill Clinton by listing at length all known Republican sex offenders, it was a disservice to my cause of helping improve our dialog about sex in a positive way. I am no better than Ken Starr if I'm publicizing sex offenses as he did with Clinton (who's “offense” was arguably not).

Sex-positivity, as I've personally defined it, is really just an acknowledgement of sex's existence, it's nature, and it's positive possibilities. I recently challenged one anti-gay-marriage man by very simply positing that our legal framework today understands the age of consent to be 18. Consenting adults, therefore, should be allowed to enter into contracts of their choosing, regardless of gender or how many people want to enter said contract. Yes, I'm talking about polygamy there. Explain to me, oh nay-sayers, how this legal framework would degrade to condone bestiality or worse, as so many anti-gay people have hypothesized?

Our system functions currently, regarding as an example, child pornography laws, to charge even underage individuals when they send suggestive images of themselves from their cellphones, a practice colloquially called sexting. Such individuals, if found guilty, must register as sex offenders and therefore face public scrutiny for the rest of their lives.

We have made the decision, culturally and by way of age of consent laws, that child pornography is unacceptable. And we've sensationalized it enough that we decided sex offenders should register such that their names, addresses, and other information are public domain, presumably for everyone's protection. Unfortunately, the teenager who sends a cheeky photo of him/herself must now forever face difficulties in housing, employment, or just plain being “normal”, as a consequence of RSO disclosure laws.

We might benefit by calling everyone a victim of our sex-negative media (The old dogs have got a new trick: It's called criminalize the symptoms while we spread the disease.—Ani Difranco). We have a choice: to either slide down the slippery slope of rounding up and banishing sex offenders, or to improve our dialog about sex such that teenagers aren't convinced a sexy photo is their best shot at getting noticed.

Dear Ms. Bushman

Dear Ms. Bushman,

We certainly understand the issues surrounding the addition of our new
fees as well as the increase of some existing ones. However, Delta must
be prudent and run our business in a way that ensures we are here to
bring you to your favorite destinations for a long time to come.

Keep in mind that if you are a Delta Medallion Member, or if you choose
to purchase a First or Business Class ticket, you will not incur a fee
for a second checked bag.

We appreciate you taking the time to share with us your thoughts on
Delta's products and services and hope for your understanding as we do
our best to remain a strong carrier so that we may continue serving our
customers all over the globe.
Sincerely,

Angi Wachowicz
Online Customer Support Desk

http://www.delta.com

Good Stuff, Old Media

What WILL we do with all this great stuff available for us to behold these days? I'm referring to everything: bad and good. Good for obvious reasons, Bad so we can have a hierarchical context from which to judge what's good.

There is so much art, music, information, STUFF! How will we take it all in? Can we? It seems a shame not to try, mortal as we are. But we only have so many hours in a day. Will the future accommodate more and more people making that very attempt?

I'm thinking microchip implants. I just can't fathom any other way.

Hope

Let this new year be one of hope.

We've tried everything else.

Amen.