Lonely Antiestablishmentarianists
Ha! When I was grade-school-age, that word’s stepchild, antidisestablishmentarianism, was the boasting tool for anyone wanting to prove their spelling prowess. I, being apparently antiestablishmental from a very young age, argued that in fact the longest word was something else; a word which now escapes me. Not unfortunately, because it turns out even that word, whatever it was, wasn’t the longest in the English language. The longest word, technically, is some chemical term for a lung disease or something. In any event, I oughtta wrap up this introductory paragraph with a statement that ties this childhood narrative into a thesis on antiestablishmentarian propensity in contemporary history, and I thought of a premise tonight whilst watching "Burn After Reading", so there we go.
My impression on the first viewing was not only that the movie is friggin’ awesomely hilarious, but that it was a convoluted epic tale that took unrelated individuals and knocked them together in a tragi-comedic particle collider for no apparent reason (hence the tragedy). I realized tonight, however, that the tumult in "Burn After Reading" arises from the proverbial butterfly effect catalyzed in the opening scene.
*spoiler alert*
In the beginning, a man is fired, or more specifically, told he is being "moved out" of his position at the C.I.A.. Instead of letting them fire him, Cox (the man referenced above), preemptively quits. We can glean from his interactions that he’s an antiestablishment-type that muckraked, perhaps a little too much. We’re not sure that’s what got him "fired". In fact, the reason given at the exit interview is his drinking problem, to which he replied, "you’re a Mormon! Next to you, we ALL have a drinking problem!" Gotta love Mormons at the C.I.A..
You wanna see a drinking problem?! Cox’ll show you DRINKING PROBLEM. And so, his cheating wife now has real ammunition to divorce him, the proceedings for which she burns his financials and, tertiarily, his in-progress memoirs to disc, gives them to her lawyer’s receptionist who, in dropping the disc at her gym inadvertently lands the data in the hands of a personal trainer who is mislead by her hapless Hardbody accomplice to perceive the "highly classified shit" as a bargaining chip to pay the high cost of the cosmetic surgery she’s desperate to undergo and which she temporarily forgot about upon falling for the man who was initially having an affair with Cox’s wife. People die. People are literally murdered in this circus of events because of a string of misunderstandings arising from Cox’s bad fortune. I just went to the script to count the number of times he mutters, or yells, "what the fuck?". It was only 4, apparently. But this phrase seems to sum up the overarching theme in the movie.
I think the film serves as a warning to any establishment that would attempt to silence those who speak truth to power. If you think about it, each character suffers their fate directly or indirectly as a result of the C.I.A.’s firing move. "Burn After Reading" ends with the department head closing the case, saying "I’m fucked if I know what we did (to contribute to the case)". And there’s the irony: those at the tippy-top these days seem not to realize, or believe, or even care, that their decisions have serious consequences on the world.
WTF?!